St. Joseph Media implements "short-term" 5% pay cuts
St. Joseph Media, publisher of major consumer magazines such as Toronto Life, Fashion, WeddingBells and Canadian Family, told employees this morning that their pay will be cut by 5% from April to October and that work weeks for the months of July and August will be reduced to four days. "For somebody earning $40,000 a year, after deductions, their take home pay will go down about $26 a week," said St. Joseph Media president Doug Knight.
Knight says the cuts are necessary because the "meltdown of advertising revenues continues unabated." Canadian magazine ad revenues for the first quarter of 2009 are likely down by more than 20%, he added. "We're matching costs to revenues as best as we can," Knight said. "At the end of the day it's about protecting jobs."
Asked whether the reduction in labour hours will diminish the quality of magazines produced, Knight noted that St. Joseph traditionally offers workers summer hours, where they may leave at 1 p.m. on Friday but are expected to work an extra half hour from Monday to Thursday.
"From a production point of view, [the summer] is a time when we have the most flexibility," Knight added. "But yes, people will have to plan their work and make sure everything gets done in that period of time."
5% pay cut probably eradicates any raises from the past two or three years. Also, $26 per week, or $104 per month, actually matters when you're trying to live in Toronto on $40K. Hope this makes it possible to avoid layoffs. Let's also hope it's a nice summer so the staffers can at least enjoy their extra day off.
2. Annonymous2 says:
17 March 2009 at 2:08 PM
I find it hard to believe that in order to handle the same workload staff won't be coming in on their day off to get it done. I appreciate the attempt to save jobs and understand that times are tight, but maybe taking it out on the folks that make 40K a year isn't the right way to go.
3. Happy says:
17 March 2009 at 3:31 PM
Isn't it time to re-evaluate what is important in life and perhaps chasing the almighty dollar isn't one of them. Enjoy your 4 day work week people because we all know that this city is all about sucking the life out of you and when there is nothing left you get tossed. Long over due the 4 day work week. Sign me up for the entire year! See you at the cottage.
4. Anonymous3 says:
17 March 2009 at 4:53 PM
Frankly, I’m getting sick and tired of hearing about all the “little people” in publishing bearing the brunt of this recession. Why haven’t we seen a sliding scale where the big earners take more of a hit than then the little ones? After all the layoffs at SJM I'm sure the last thing these people need to help their morale is less money in their pocket and more work to do.
5. Some Guy says:
18 March 2009 at 9:40 AM
I think this applies to all employees, not just those making 40K a year. It looks like that was used for illustration purposes.
Do they disclose for July and August if those employees will be reduced to 80% of their salary? That is probably the bigger story.
6. Marco Ursi says:
18 March 2009 at 10:09 AM
The 5% pay cut is company wide, affecting everyone from Doug Knight to editorial assistants. The 5% salary decrease will be spread out from April to October, but is equivalent to the seven days employees won't be at the office in July and August.
7. Patrick says:
18 March 2009 at 11:06 AM
And at Transcontinental Media, senior managers are giving up two weeks salary, with no associated time off (in comparison, everyone else is taking a week's pay cut, but gets a week off).
8. Tom Tom says:
18 March 2009 at 11:41 AM
40K per year? And they have the nerve to cut another 5%. Sure glad I don't work there.
9. Madmediaworker says:
18 March 2009 at 11:57 AM
I'd be curious to know if those important lunch accounts,trips and Starbucks write-offs the people at the top there enjoy so much could have been cut instead. I am so sick of hearing it's "to avoid cutting jobs." Trim some fat from the top. The fish rots from the head.
10. Curious says:
18 March 2009 at 12:25 PM
Has anyone asked whether or not there is a correlation between this and St. Joseph's announcement last week of their big new expansion of their print division facilities? I understand times are tough, but is this just a sneaky excuse to get the employees to pay the bill for the expansion during a time that they couldn't afford it otherwise? Would these cuts still be happening if they weren't expanding their print division? Just asking.
11. Norm De Plume says:
18 March 2009 at 10:41 PM
I could be mistaken, but I don't believe they're expanding their print facilities, they're consolidating existing facilities into a building they already own ... so it's probably a cost-cutting measure, not an expansion.
12. Anon says:
19 March 2009 at 9:40 AM
These StJ suits are real geniuses. First open a printing plant just as print journalism is dying on the vine, then poison your entire corporate environment with these band-aid cuts that will breed resentment at just about every single desk. Smart, smart strategies. I guess at least they finally figured out that shutting down magazines doesn't work.
13. The Little Guy says:
21 March 2009 at 2:23 PM
I think Doug has his numbers wrong or accounting hasn't given him the updated reports. Conumer magazine ad spending is down 35%- 40%. You can probably apply that number to all media excluding online. I think P&G has single - handily kept the tv business alive.
14. Terry says:
24 March 2009 at 12:33 PM
Interesting how many people think that "maintaining the status quo" was the other option. Nobody wants a pay cut, but losing your job sucks and at least getting equivalent time off softens the blow.
15. Sunshine says:
26 March 2009 at 10:10 AM
You're all a bunch of whining babies! Grow up - there are hundreds of thousands of people with no jobs currently which equals NO INCOME! Be thankful your employer is doing something proactive to weather this storm. It will pass and those of you that are gracious will be rewarded.
16. Client (for Now) says:
30 March 2009 at 1:00 PM
SJM has an identity issue. You seem to be a print company that owns magazines. From what I've heard you have departments 'cough..Credit..' that need to be put in their place. Times like these you must put your customers first. What a surprise credit departments are good at one thing…harassing people. This equals losing clients. Take a close look at your credit department or risk losing the clients you are lucky to have. Such amateurs take a step back and remember there is a bigger picture.