Saturday, March 22, 2014
Here’s the challenge: how do publishers monetize content in a market where there is a growing supply of ads and a changing model for how ads are delivered and sold? Typically, the selling of digital ads has followed a direct sales route to clients and ad agencies. Now, a distribution model that is common in the IT industry is emerging in the digital publishing world: channel marketing, where OEM manufacturers have resellers for their products in addition to their direct sales force. This strategy enables companies to reach new markets that their direct sales team doesn’t talk to.
The first developments of this channel were the remnant ad networks. The most familiar are Google Ad Sense and Casale Media. Rates in these ad networks are $3-$5 CPM for impressions, where magazine publishers in the direct sale model like to sell at $20+ CPM. The pay-per-click model pays $1.50 click on average and you need to deliver 100,000 impressions to generate 100 clicks (0.1% CTR). The problems with this model are that resellers may cannibalize the direct sales; lower pricing that the publishers cannot control; and the need for economies of scale (i.e. millions of visitors and low ROI).
“Real-Time Bidding” technology is a new ad network that addresses some of the concerns stated above. It follows the principles of a commodity exchange market modeled after the financial sector. Publishers can list their ad inventory for sale in these ad exchanges with a minimum price. There are a number of exchanges that you can choose from and this inventory can then be purchased through a dealer network—software accesses these ad exchanges and bids on the inventory based on set target market criteria and budgets.
The marketing promise is that advertisers can target a user based on in-depth criteria and create a personalized message to optimize sales opportunities in an auction market for media purchases—all in real time.
Real Time Bidding Technology. (via Sourcego2mobi.com) Click to view large
The Real-Time Bidding model as explained on Wikipedia: “A typical transaction begins with a user visiting a mobile website. This triggers a bid request that can include various pieces of data such as the user’s demographic information, browsing history, location, and the page being loaded. The request goes from the publisher to an ad exchange, which submits it and the accompanying data to multiple advertisers who automatically submit bids in real time to place their ads. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Real-time_bidding
“Advertisers bid on each ad impression as it is served. The impression goes to the highest bidder and their ad is served on the mobile page. This process is repeated for every ad slot on the mobile page. Real time bidding transactions typically happen within 100 milliseconds from a user visiting a website.
The bidding happens autonomously and advertisers set maximum bids and budgets for an advertising campaign. The criteria for bidding on particular types of consumers can be very complex, taking into account everything from very detailed behavioral profiles to conversion data.”
The Ecosystem (via businessinsider.com)
Publishers will have to learn new tech terms, like demand-side platforms (the technology that helps the bidder connect to the ad exchanges) and supply-side platforms (which help publishers manage multiple ad networks and connect to the ad exchanges). Data intelligence, creative optimization and ad/brand security companies are part of this system according to the Business Intelligence infographic above. Trading desks, another part of the ecosystem, are being established at major ad agencies like Media Experts.
Media Experts has released “Programmatic Trading Q4 2013 year end review of the RTB market,” a comprehensive report
that shows who the players are in these auction model markets. According to the report, Media Experts leverages over 400,000 websites spanning display, video, mobile and social inventory to generate $133 million in e-commerce sales for its clients in the RTB market.
A representative from SiteScout, one of the dealers (demand side) that provides the technology for these ad exchanges, says that publishers can see a range from $0.50 CPM to $40 CPM depending on the market niche delivered. Dealers take a 20% commission from the publisher, and publishers also pay the ad exchanges a listing fee.
The challenges facing this new ecosystem are: addressing the privacy issues the come up when tracking people’s web surfing habits with spyware/cookies; and the task of weeding out websites that are contributing to click and impression fraud. I had Acuity Ads, another demand-side vendor, provide me with a list of sports websites that I could bid impressions on for a media buy. I picked out five websites and learned that two of them would never be on a media plan, but the other three would if they delivered my target market of M18+, living in Toronto.
(LSU College Football)
(UK sports website)
(Sports video aggregator that does not load on my computer)
(Live video sports website, that only has a home page)
As a media buyer, I would be concerned with where my ads show up, and with ads showing on sites that would not be brand safe, no matter what the cost. I have heard stories from another media buyer about how a site they never heard of had generated so many ad impressions and clickthroughs. One vendor at DX3, a digital trade show that was held in Toronto this March, says that click fraud may be as high as 40% of all clicks. It has been estimated that bots generate 50% of all web traffic, so buying respected media brands is still very important in online media planning.
Programmatic media buying is an application of big data based on a person’s web surfing habits, and predicting when that person is at different stages of the buying cycle to determine what ad is delivered to them. This is like predicting when a person is buying a car, just shopping, or dreaming – a form of artificial intelligence. The jury is out on if there is a technology to deliver this with mathematical certainty, or if this just another geek pipe dream.
Thursday, February 06, 2014
What is cloud computing? It is a computer model where a person can access files remotely via the internet. These files can be software applications, videos, games, photos or documents. The ‘cloud’ is a metaphor for all the data stored somewhere on servers. These are called server farms, where you may have 10,000 servers providing the computing power, data centres that can be used for credit card processing, web hosting, and university research supercomputers.
A server farm - welcome to the cloud (image via acidcow.com)
Some of the established cloud software applications publishers might be familiar with are digital edition providers like GTxcel (formerly Texterity), MagazineCloner, Uberflip, Zinio, etc. Salesforce, a sales support and CRM application, was one of the first cloud software applications to become popular among the business community. All you need is a login ID and password and you are good to go to use it on any computer, tablet and smartphone.
Acer C720 Chromebook
The Google Chromebook, starting at $269, is an attempt to lower the cost of computers with cloud laptops. The laptops come with the Chrome web browser, Gmail, productivity software, online storage and the Android app store—all the tools you need for the digital world, through the internet via your web browser.
The laptop has enough power for everyday use and is powered by an Intel Celeron 1.4 GHz processor. Most laptops today come with more than 2.0 GHz, but since the Chromebook does not need to power as much software it can lose the extra processing power to keep costs down. It uses the Chrome OS, has 2 GB of RAM, a 32 GB hard drive, an 11.6” HD display and webcam. Connections include wireless, Bluetooth, ethernet, USB, HDMI and RGB. The battery has a five-hour life per charge.
My first impression was this was a major change from how I do things on a laptop. Usually all my files are on a hard drive and I can launch my software applications from there. Having to do that in the cloud made me uneasy. However, my uneasiness with the cloud dissipated as I got used to the Chromebook, and I now wonder if I can live without it. With the Google Drive app, Google’s online storage feature, I was able to store and access my files from any computer without needing a USB stick. This feature saved me from buying a $200 network drive to connect all my computers for shared storage. I then installed the Google Drive app on all my computers. Even when I am offsite I can use any computer to access Google Drive via my Gmail account login.
Microsoft’s latest pricing model for its Office 365 Home Premium software package at $99/yr. made me a proponent of using Google productivity applications. It just doesn’t make any sense over the long term to pay $99 a year to use their software, or $249 per PC for the Office Home and Business 2013 package. The Google Chromebook for $269 comes with all the software I need to write, create spreadsheets and presentations, and is a wiser alternative.
Life in the cloud has its conveniences. But to be able to access your files requires an internet connection, so the Chromebook also has drawbacks as there are limited offline capabilities. However, internet access is getting ubiquitous and is available in a lot of public places including the local hockey rink, fast food restaurants, airports etc., so that issue is not that big perhaps.
My daughter, the resident teen geek in the house, actually prefers using a laptop over an iPad due to her dissatisfaction with touch keyboards and the lack of Flash to play games at her favourite games site. Watching video on a laptop was also easier than with a tablet, as you did not have to hold it. Watching Netflix, we found the sound a little underpowered, but once we connected our headphones the sound quality was superb.
The Google Chromebook is a successful first attempt to lower the cost of computing. The price point is well positioned to shake things up with units starting from $269, and it is available from Acer, Samsung, HP and Lenovo, established hardware brands. The Chromebook could be a tablet killer based on price and features alone, not to mention consumer dissatisfaction with touch typing. In comparison, you can get the recently released Dell 8” Windows tablet with no keyboard for $299, or you can get a Chromebook that includes a keyboard but no touchscreen.
Rating: 4 out of 5
In 2013, the Chromebook comprised 21% of all laptop sales in the USA according to NPD
, up from nothing the year before, and the next generation of Chromebooks will get even better. Following the ebb and flow of technology is like following the fashion world. What is the latest tech look, and is it a trend or just a fad? Will that look come back? Perhaps in 2014, the laptop will be back in vogue with this new facelift from Google.
Thursday, January 09, 2014
As we enter 2014 with great hope and optimism, we reflect on what we have seen and learned. This post was inspired by seeing a mouse in my garage scurry away into a crack in the wall. This mouse was fat and looked like it could barely walk. Easy prey for my cat, Mac. What makes a mouse overeat, knowing that overeating will lead to its demise? This instinct cannot be a conscious decision.
Companies and people behave in this instinctive manner too. They strive for growth and wealth, which will ultimately lead to their demise through evil deeds, unethical acts or overconfidence. This instinct has been built into business schools disguised as market share (I want to have a monopoly), demand pricing models (look at how airlines raise prices 24 hours before a flight), planned product obsolescence (like the latest Windows XP fear tactics, using security threats to make you buy Windows 8. Call it FUD – Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt), or just plain trickery and deceit disguised as marketing.
The capital market is a classic example of Big Fat Mouse Syndrome in society, and this percolates down into the boardrooms of public companies and their business strategies. Why are there bear and bull markets, and how many times has the market crashed? There is always a stock scam lurking somewhere. Technology companies wishing for their product to be the next killer app will try to convince publishers that whatever they are selling will be the gateway to riches.
This type of marketing has been around forever, chronicled in the Bible as the sheep in wolf’s clothing. The best example of this is this recent look
at an ad from 1913, and how a company used fear and misinformation to sell their breakfast beverage, telling parents that coffee is bad for kids.
The latest over hyped technology fads I see in 2014 are called content marketing, cloud computing and big data. Content marketing is just another word for advertorial with a digital spin. Companies assume readers will be fooled by stories written to attract people to a brand (some are even fake articles created by scammers). As this chart below suggests, the credibility of these articles is low. Magazine publishers have responded to this concept with sponsored content and run the risk of alienating readers with advertorial packaged as content. I expect this fad will die on the vine as companies realize that people are not fools and will go to brands they trust, such as magazine publishers who provide a neutral voice in the market.
Source: Forrester Research (Click to view large)
Now, cloud computing has been around for years also, it was just called something different. In the old days of computing, a company had a large mainframe computer with dummy terminals where staff could access info and software. Today it is on a consumer level that is global in scale. What the pundits don’t tell you about this model are the security risks. Buying products online (which is the cloud, btw), you run the risk of your credit card number being stolen, and we know banks are in constant battle with hackers. Cloud computing makes the thievery easier as data is transferred to the public internet. Plus, companies also use this data to monitor your habits and invade your privacy too.
This model has lead to software rental models that have people paying for lifetime usage without owning the product. I guess they took a page out of the water-heater playbook. Don’t be fooled as some companies have been using the cloud model to create a revenue model for life to appease capital markets and raise their stock price. Don’t buy into these rental models, as it is legalized scam in my opinion. Wait for companies to capitulate on this pricing model.
Another area with a lot of misinformation is big data. Circulators, as experts on database marketing, will know that this is just a smoke screen to sell you some technology services you think you might need to discover untapped riches. You can spin your wheels analyzing a lot of useless information that will not generate sales. The best example of big data’s limitations are economic and weather forecasts, which have lots of data and do not have a 100% success rate.
Here is what the big data pundits won’t tell you. I came across a fact that says website traffic is increasingly non-human (I wonder why the geniuses at Google have not found a way to monitor this in Google Analytics). This study shows that the growth of automated traffic is as high as 60% of web traffic, but the click-bots and click-fraud benefit digital ad networks, so they hide these facts from you. Big data has potential, but make sure you get the right data.
Source: Incapsula (Click to view large)
Publishers have had to deal with social media, digital editions, magazine apps and HTML5 websites to make their brands modern, but it has been a struggle to make money with these efforts. The web world has an oversupply of ad inventory now due to a gold rush mentality and no barriers to entry. The revenue potential is falling to as low as $3 CPM for display ads on consumer sites.
History has shown that when a gold rush mentality is created, the chance of finding gold is slim, but the people that supply the tools, accommodation and other services can make a lot of money as people chase their dream. So in 2014 read between the lines, dig deeper into the claims of technology vendors, and make wise technology choices. Happy New Year!
Thursday, December 05, 2013
There is still time to get that Christmas gadget this year, and the sales season has begun with Black Friday and Cyber Monday. One thing is for sure: mobile computer toys are much more affordable gifts nowadays: e-readers for less than $100; tablets from $150 in any size you want, 6”, 8”, and 10” that run Android, Apple and Microsoft software; and laptops from $250 that feature the Google Chromebook. You can even get a 32” TV for $168.
But while the choice this year is fantastic, the devices we purchase come with a lot of user restrictions. We don’t have a lot of the freedoms with digital tech that we have with other products—freedoms that we take for granted.
My Christmas Wish List is all about digital freedom: the freedom to choose the device I want and consume the content I want, in the same way I would with a toaster. I can plug a new toaster in anywhere and can use any type of bread I want from any baker. I can even bake the bread myself. Is that too much to ask?
It is ironic that a purchaser has more rights when they buy toasters than they do buying smartphones, tablets, computers, software and digital content. So this year, to promote digital freedom, I have created a Toaster Bill of Rights for Digital Freedom for my Xmas wish list.
Toaster Purchaser Rights
The purchaser has the right to buy a toaster that fits the purchaser’s needs and tastes. The toaster can be used with any electrical service provider offering a competitive price in any location of the purchaser’s choosing.
The purchaser can remain anonymous to the manufacturer and does need to register with the manufacturer to use the toaster during the ownership period of the toaster purchased.
The toaster manufacturer does not have the right to monitor, without consent, via any technical device, the purchaser’s use of the toaster, including what type of bread is being used, what times the toaster is used, and if the purchaser shares the toaster with a friend or family member.
The manufacturer cannot charge the purchaser for each additional person using the toaster.
If the toaster is sold with an electrical services contract, the purchaser has the right to substitute a toaster of his or her own choosing, from any vendor, if the toaster is lost, stolen or damaged.
If the toaster breaks, parts and service will be readily available at a reasonable price and the manufacturer cannot stop supplying parts for the said product. Charges for a repair cannot cost more than a new device.
The toaster manufacturer will provide a warranty to the toaster purchaser that in event of a new product being launched, bread can still be purchased for the toaster purchased.
The manufacturer gives up all rights at the time of purchase for further charges to the purchaser in the form an annual usage charge during the ownership period of the toaster.
The toaster purchaser can pay for electrical power service for the toaster based on actual consumption, as a purchase option, at a reasonable rate. In case of bulk fixed rate contracts, where there is a rotating monthly time of expiration, a credit to the account will be applied to the purchaser for any unused amounts.
* * *
I know this is a pretty big Xmas wish list. I just found it very surprising how much personal freedom we give up sometimes when buying digital content and devices. For recommendations on specific gadgets for this holiday season, check out some my blog postings
from the past couple years.
Dear Santa, meet the Tesla
But secretly, what I want for Christmas this year is a 17” in-car tablet computer for my car, like you see in the Tesla Electric Car. (And a new toaster of course.) This tablet computer connects to the internet, your smartphone, and the car’s computer systems for navigation, music and dashboard diagnostic monitors. Now that would be the ultimate gadget for me this year.
Happy Holidays and Best Wishes to you this Christmas Season.
Thursday, November 28, 2013
The COPAs, now in its 5th year, is a snapshot of what is happening in Canada in digital content. The COPAs attract media players from the worlds of television, newspaper, magazine and digital, to see who is the Best in Canada. Some of the winners this year were schools and students. The UBC Graduate School of Journalism, for example, won two golds for its use of video and multimedia. The consumption of video/multimedia/interactive content on the web is growing and I thought it would be good to show where the bar is set in Canada with these COPA winners.
The PAIN project and CUT entries from the UBC students, through their creative use of video, links and animation, create a truly engaging reader experience—similar to playing an interactive video game, but still telling a strong story. The other Gold winner in the video and multimedia category was the The UC Observer
for its documentary on homeless shelters. The CBC won Best Interactive Solution of the Year for an infographic used to illustrate its investigative report on offshore tax havens.
Let’s hear from the winners below.
* * *
The Pain Project - Gold - Blue category for business media
The Pain Project investigates the lack of access to morphine, the gold standard for treating pain. Teams travelled to India, Ukraine and Uganda to explore how such countries manage the pain of patients suffering from cancer and other terminal diseases. The stories of patients, caregivers and other stakeholders are featured in 13 short videos. They reveal how a combination of bureaucratic hurdles and the chilling effect of the global drug war are largely to blame, leaving humanitarians scrambling to work outside the law — or change the law — to bring relief to suffering patients all over the world.
The Pain Project (Click images to view projects)
CUT - Gold - Green Category for news media
CUT is based on a year-long investigation into the roots of global illegal logging. Ten journalism students in UBC’s International Reporting Program conducted on-the-ground reporting in three logging hotspots—Indonesia, Russia and Cameroon. They analyzed the environmental and social costs and the role of consumers. To engage viewers, the image of an apartment filled with wood products links to the producing country. An introductory video leads users to explore illegal logging in three countries along with related stories. Throughout the site, the multimedia character of the project is enhanced through videos, text, images, GIFs and audio clips.
The UC Observer - Gold - Red category for consumer magazines
The UBC International Reporting Program, CUT
reported on Canada's Out of the Cold programs, which shelter untold thousands every winter. For this short multimedia feature, the magazine returned to Waterloo, Ont.'s First United Church and found an ongoing need. Together, the narratives reveal the underlying problems of poverty and livelihood instability, not to mention the solutions moving forward. Equally important, we aspired to and succeeded in humanizing all of the subjects in this short online documentary.
CBC News - Best Interactive Solution of the Year - Offshore Tax Haven infographgic
The UC Observer, Cold Comfort
Before unveiling our massive tax-haven investigation, CBCNews.ca
decided it was critical to explain how the murky offshore world works. Text alone would not convey the complexity. We opted for an interactive animation that maps the proliferation of tax havens and the ways investors use them. Users follow the same steps a tax evader would, choosing a jurisdiction, setting up a trust and opening an account.
CBC News, Stashing Their Cash
* * *
The art of digital story telling is taking a new form with these COPA winners—a convergence of sight, sound, technical wizardry and words. What was surprising was that it took a group of students to lead they way in this year’s winner’s circle. The best ideas and inventions all started out as school projects, and the hub at the UBC Graduate School of Journalism offers a look at how we may tell stories in the future.
Thursday, October 31, 2013
We are likely now at a tipping point where mobile devices have reached mass adoption (40% market adoption is considered a mass market). We have 28 million cellphone users in Canada with a smartphone and tablet in the home. And with so many devices around, it is inevitable that some will break—which is why a new industry is emerging for fixing all the phones and tablets that have been dropped and cracked, dipped in water or had their batteries fried.
I have seen my kids’ Apple iPod Touch screens crack through daily use over three years and my own Blackberry Playbook tablet cracked when I dropped it on the bathroom floor. It will cost $125-$150 to fix according Ryan Winborrows at nerds4hire.com
, with the glass costing around $80.
With that in mind this month, I set out to review a tablet device that would not break when dropped, and wanted to look at the Panasonic Toughpad tablet designed for mobile workers.
Panasonic is a Japanese company that manufactures a range of electronics for consumer, business and industrial markets. It was the fourth largest TV manufacturer in the world in 2012. The Toughpad’s design is based on the company’s Toughbook line of laptop computers for the business market.
The Panasonic Toughpad FZ-G1
The Panasonic Toughpad is an industrial-strength tablet and is available in Android and Window configurations in 7” and 10” models. There is a 20” model, weighing 5 lbs., set for release in November 2013 geared for creative professionals. The Toughpad FZ-G1 is 10” machine using Windows. It is 0.8” thick and weighs 2.4 lbs. It has a stylus with a built-in cradle and is optimized for outdoor use. With an Intel 1.9 GHz processor, 128 GB solid state drive and 4G RAM, it has lots of computer power.
How do you test a tablet that claims it will not break? I took it camping to give it a whirl.
I liked the feel of the device as it was easy to hold (less slippery than others) and I did not have to baby it. I left it around the campsite, tossed it around in the tent and watched rain drip on it while reading an ebook. It also survived me dropping it on my office floor and was durable enough to pass the kid-proof test.
At the campsite, I was able to connect to the internet via wifi through my smartphone’s internet-sharing feature. The device also supports LTE 4G networks as an optional feature. Battery life is rated at eight hours and you can buy extra batteries and car adapter. It has plug covers for the USB, HDMI and power connections, so dirt and dust won’t get in, and features seven tablet buttons with two that are programmable by the user.
What I did not like was that it needed a fan to cool the processor. It was not waterproof, just water-resistant, and the Android version does not have a fan in its design.
Panasonic Toughpad cradle
The Panasonic Toughpad FZ-G1 tablet is versatile and can convert into laptop mode, using a cradle and bluetooth connection for switching to traditional keyboard.
RATING: 4 out of 5
This tablet fits the needs of mobile workers in industries such as construction, health, engineering, mining and military, a market niche that Panasonic dominates. This quality does not come cheap as the Android 7” model is priced from $1,250, the 10” at $1,350 and the Windows 10” version from $2,250. The tablets are backed by a three-year parts and labour warranty. Based on this price point, this device will only have luxury-consumer niche appeal. Panasonic will need to create another version if it wants to go after the wider consumer market.
Monday, September 30, 2013
How important is SEO, or search engine optimization, to a magazine website or info-publisher (today’s new buzzword)? Where is the ROI? Is it an essential skill that your team has to have? Effective SEO requires a team effort, from the writers in how they craft their words, to the marketing team when they broadcast the content on social media channels, to the web team when they tag articles and photos for search engine spiders.
Search engines favour quality content and this standard will ensure your content will rise to the top of the rankings. This emphasis on quality content by search engines has spawned content marketing services, and the creation of “Media Brands” by advertisers as part of their marketing mix.
Image via referlinksfullcirclemarketing.com
OK then, we all know we need a SEO strategy. I am not an expert on SEO, so I asked Patrick Herman from the Search Engine People
what a good strategy would be for today’s publisher.
“SEO is of paramount importance for information publishers and why shouldn't it be? You're spreading news across the Net! Think of SEO from even bigger terms, in ways that can really benefit the site. Use the Google Keyword Tool to source keywords you can write content around. You can quite literally create thousands of pages (of course, set up the standard on-page factors to help get found) of content that can be searched and found generating traffic from thousands of different keywords right to your site.
So, what would I do? I'd research keywords that people are looking for, questions that need answers, hot topics/current events. Write compelling content that people can AND will want to use and share via their social outlets. Your content can drive infinite visitors organically, through social traffic and by way of other sites wanting to pick up that great piece of content. Heck, you can even turn that great content into a video, tweets, an infographic and much more. And yes, this is all SEO, all about optimizing your content for search engines.
From an advertiser’s perspective you're adding more impressions, more targeted pages that an advertiser may want to be a part of and of course this all helps the bottom line in sales efforts.
You've got content and you need it to show up where people are searching. With an effective SEO strategy you can make sure all of this happens for your site.”
Wise words for sure from the SEO camp. Let’s see what the numbers tells us. I had a look at the COPA website
stats on Alexa.com
, a free public website monitoring web stats, and discovered what key words are driving search engine traffic to the COPA site.
TOP key words driving traffic to canadianonlinepublishingawards.com
1. copa awards 18.%
2. online publishers association 12%
3. worlds best online publishers 7%
4. hire a new grad in marketing canada copayment 6%
5. top canadian online magazines 6%
, Sept 12, 2013
The traffic numbers are comprised of 18% brand, 25% subject and 6% unrelated searches. This tells me I am reaching a new reader through subject searches; but their true intent and search objectives when they typed these key words is still relatively unknown. Search engine traffic is a small percentage of the total at 3.7% at this point in time. We launched a COPA 2013 Judges blog on September 23 to help this grow.
Here is a funny Negative SEO movie satire on how to survive a hacker attack. Hopefully, it will scare off spammers. (Via siliconbeachtraining.co.uk)
Optimizing for search engine traffic can best be described as fishing for new readers. You need to have a rod (content) in the water. The more fishing lines (links) you have the more bites (visitors) you will have. Some fish may just nibble and go away and you may even catch a few (subscribers). You will never know what fish are biting at anytime (the anonymous world of the internet), but you need to be ready to catch them at a second’s notice (I want to buy now!).
Thursday, August 15, 2013
A rising company in the personal computer hardware market is ASUS, who came on my radar when I reviewed the Google Nexus 7 Android
tablet that was based on the ASUS Nexus 7 model. Based in Taiwan, ASUS was the fifth largest computer hardware maker in 2012 after HP, Lenovo, DELL and Acer, according to industry estimates.
The company was founded in 1990 by four computer engineers that used to work for Acer, another Taiwanese company. ASUS had sales of $14 billion in 2012 and 12,500 employees worldwide with roots in manufacturing computer parts like motherboards (the brains of a computer). It produces a wide range of computer hardware products that includes desktops, laptops, tablets and routers under the ASUS, Transformer and Nexus brands. In June 2013, it launched the ASUS Fonepad, a 6” tablet that includes a 3G smartphone. (I need to get one of these to play with.)
ASUS TAICHI- The Laptop/Tablet Hybrid model
The ASUS TAICHI is a laptop/tablet model that comes with two screens, one for tablet mode and the other for laptop. Previous models I have seen that offer both a tablet and laptop user experience use either a single-screen swivel or a detachable screen configuration (see my Feb 2013 blog
review of a detachable screen model). ASUS has taken this hybrid concept to another level and created something cool with the two screens.
The ASUS TAICHI is two devices in one. It is thin at 0.7”, weighs only 2.8 lbs, and uses Windows 8 for its operating system. Its dimensions are 12” x 7.83” with an 11.6” screen. This machine has an INTEL 1.7 GHz dual core processor, so it has decent speeds (2+ GHz is preferred). It comes with two cameras, two USB ports, VGA & HDMI connections for external monitors, 4GB RAM and has 128 and 256 GB memory options. There is no ethernet port though, so you will have to rely on wi-fi for your internet connection.
The tablet experience, with an 11.6” touch screen, offers more real estate than other tablets, but I found it a little heavy holding the tablet for extended periods using one hand. In couch potato mode this was not a concern as it sat on my lap. Battery life was 3-5 hours depending on usage, whereas tablets normally have 8-10 hours of battery life and weigh 1-2 lbs depending on whether they are 10” or 7” tablets.
The laptop experience is like using a slick ultra-thin metallic shell laptop with a backlit keyboard weighing 2.8 lbs. When you are in laptop mode the user experience is based on the Windows 7 interface, and it will switch to Windows 8 when you go into tablet mode. Ryan Winsborrow from nerds4hire.com
says he was frustrated when switching from tablet to laptop mode or vice versa when using Internet Explorer as they were two different versions of the web browser and did not sync together. he was able to configure to work on the Windows 7 version only, but it is not very touch-friendly to use, I like the Window 8 IE browser better in tablet mode.
The two-screen approach offers a smoother transition between modes versus others I have played with. It is less clumsy to use compared to a swivel or detachable screen approach, which I found very appealing, plus it was all in one device.
RATING: 4 out 5
The ASUS TAICHI is a cool computer toy for the person that wants it all. It ranges in price from $1,200 to $1,500 depending on the configuration you choose. Basically, it is in the price range of the ultra-thin laptop choices currently in the marketplace but with a second tablet touch screen as part of the package. Winsborrow rated the ASUS TAICHI 4 out of 5 as well as he also found it heavy for a tablet and thought the battery life could be better, but overall we liked its compact size and versatility as an everyday work device for mobile people!
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
The growth of picture sharing tools has created a new social media channel for magazine publishers and their content. (I know, another one!) You might have heard all the numbers: Poster child Instagram has 130 million monthly users (50% USA) posting 45 million photos a day, and Pinterest has its 48.7 million users (83% female).
Instagram was launched in October 2010 as an app for smartphones and is available on Apple and Android devices. It was bought by Facebook in 2012 and launched video sharing in June 2013.
According to a Pinterest user profile study by Engauge
, an Atlanta-based digital ad agency, people are using Pinterest for these reasons:
a) Getting inspiration with their careers or hobbies (57%)
b) Storing images of thing they dream about having (53%)
c) Keeping thoughts and ideas organized (47%)
d) Sharing ideas with others (32%)
This new channel is part of the growing mix of social media tools where a one-one digital relationship can be established. With all these new channels comes content requirements and this content is now morphing into what is called branded content, where companies create their own branded media website. Here is what is happening with Coke - you can now go to coca-colacompany.com
and get a recipe for macaroni and cheese. The website is less brand thumping and a little more soft sell and engagement. And Coke is the number one brand on Facebook according to this chart, so it has a lot of people to talk to.
Coca-Cola is the No. 1 brand on Facebook by fan growth
OK, we have a new picture sharing social media channel, what content do we package for this new form of reader engagement? This channel is a picture based not text based, or is it both? Here is a challenge for you. I invite you to create captions for these series of photos that will engage the reader, or you can just carry on the conversation with me online and see where it goes. I have tried my hand at creating a little cartoon humour with these pictures from my backyard. Please be kind with your comments.
A Day in the Life of a Garden Plant
A story of pictures and words where plants and animals can talk with each other.
While this is my first public creative stab on a “Picturetainment” message, it is based on conversational marketing principles that I talked about in an October 2011 blog posting.
But, can this message be monetized, where do we add graphic branding that is in good taste and how will you track brand mentions for ROI? Is there any paid media value here, or do we lump it into the unpaid media option as its audience reach is unpredictable? Or do we wait as brands take eyeballs away from us like Coke has done already?
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Consumption of video entertainment is shifting from cable TV to internet based. The days of the telcos selling both cable and internet is changing as people cut the cord and increasingly migrate online for their TV fix. In an eMarketer report
, 60% of US internet users surveyed told AYTM Market Research that they still had a cable TV subscription in May 2013, while another 23% said they had a subscription in the past, but not any longer. Further evidence of this trend is that 44% of households have a TV connected to the internet up from 24% in 2010 according to an LRG Research report
People are consuming internet TV/video on their smartphone, tablet, laptop, computer and smart TV. Driving this online consumption are two big players in internet TV - YouTube and Netflix, along with the ability to watch your favourite TV show from a station’s website on demand. Netflix plans to launch HD and 3D streaming in the future. As further indication of where this market might be going, take TSN, which sold an online viewing package for the World Juniors Hockey Tournament this year for $20.
Another emerging trend magazine publishers will have to keep their eye on is the use of mobile devices (smartphone and tablets) as a second screen while watching TV. In a world of multitasking people are looking at these devices during commercial breaks to learn about an actor or actress, dig up more info on the show or movie they’re watching, shop for products in ads and more, according to an April 2013 report
Can magazine publishers play in this arena with their content and produce their own internet/cable TV show? Cottage Life Media is doing as much with its partnership with Blue Ant Media. Rogers Sportsnet now includes TV, radio, magazine, digital, web and sports properties as part of its media mix. AOL
has launched a video service packaged as AOL Video Channel with 17 channels of video content covering a wide variety of topics including how-tos.
So it is only natural to look at smart TVs as part of the media equation for magazine publishers. For a sense of the equipment being offered to consumers, I had a chance to play with the Sharp Aquos Quattron 80” LED Smart 3D TV.
Sharp Aquos Quattron 80” LED Smart 3D TV
I watched it from eight feet away and it provides a large-screen theatre experience that should be the staple of any home. The field of vision at this distance did not require me to move my head to watch a show or game and it was not hard on the eyes after an evening of viewing.
The TV can connect to the internet with a Wi-Fi connection or wired ethernet. I would suggest you use a wired internet connection for a better TV experience as the Wi-Fi connection sometimes winks out while watching on home networks. Wired ethernet offers faster and more reliable transmission speeds. You may need to upgrade your Wi-Fi router too for it to connect to the TV.
Watching TV and movies on an 80” HD screen was just plain awesome. Watching sports made it feel like I was at the game and part of the action. The refresh rate though is slow in the LED model I looked at, resulting in blurring pucks while watching hockey.
For gaming, my kids got to play with their Sony PS3 on the TV. An 80” TV is not as responsive as on smaller TV due to what is called the refresh rate of the screen. On a larger screen, the reaction time between the game controllers and the movement on the screen was not as good as it is with a smaller screen, say a 32”. This is a limitation of the LED screen technology.
The Sharp Aquos Quattron Smart TV can be hooked up to pretty well any device you have that includes RGB, HDMI, ethernet, Wi-Fi and digital antennas, and is a plug-and-play set-up. The TV remote control was integrated with Netflix to make content surfing easier.
RATING - 4 out of 5
What is there not to like about an in-home theatre experience with an 80” screen that is soft on the eyes? It can be connected to an antenna, cable or the internet, so you can watch anything you want when you want. The refresh rate was a little too slow for me, but for movies the experience was superb. The chord cutting trend will only grow as people switch to internet plans that have reasonable bandwidth caps to accommodate internet TV viewing such as TekSavvy that charges $40 a month for 300G, which is more than enough for the average household.
To end on another note, I have some new responsibilities at Masthead
. I am producing the COPAs this year (Canadian Online Publishing Awards
) that will be held this November in Toronto. The entry deadline is July 19, 2013 (enter here
) and I am looking for sponsorship support from the industry. Any help will be much appreciated. You can send me a note via email at email@example.com