Canadian Magazine Industry News
7 February 2013, TORONTO
Tyler Br�l� on magazine models: "Stick to your guns"
Monocle editor-in-chief Tyler Brûlé spoke last week at the Ontario College of Art and Design. Between anecdotes about dropping out of the Ryerson School of Journalism ("once you learn how to write a lede, you're kind of done"), getting shot while covering war in Afghanistan, and describing the ins and outs of his design agency, Winkreative, Brûlé touched on a number of issues facing the magazine industry today.
Here are some excerpts from his talk.
On subscriptions and paywalls
Bankers always drive the quality—let's sell as many subscriptions as we can so that you can have Time magazine, or Newsweek, you'll get 52 issues a year, plus you'll have the talk radio, and you'll have the tacky awful nylon bag, and you can have it for $11.99. Nobody's considering the logistics. All of this seemed absolutely absurd to us [at Monocle]. How can you drive and build the business? Is there any real value? Yes, there's lots of people looking at your magazine, but are they real, engaged consumers if they're getting 52 copies a year for $11.99? That's a massive sinkhole.
We went the other way, we said we're going to have a paywall at the very beginning. And we're going to have correspondents around the world, and we're going to charge a confident price because this whole idea of selling subscriptions at such a low price is over. So we said, $150 no matter where you're from in the world. Even if you live next to the printing plant, you pay $150. Now, obviously, we make a lot of money off the people who live next to the printing plant, and we make absolutely no money off our readers in Mozambique—thankfully there's only three of them. . .
Advertisers like the fact that people are spending serious money. It obviously enables a journalistic investment on our side, but also it means the readers are completely engaged because they pay up for the brand. There's passion and commitment from our readership base.
On digital editions
I'm very convinced that the only people that are making money on a monthly basis on iPad editions are in the porn business. Because for a magazine of our size and volume you'd probably have to staff-up at least five, maybe seven people. You do the math on that, you're in half a million dollars a year. We have just not seen the surge in demand for that. For market research, I was watching people on vacation with their Kobos etc., and it was just sort of watching people a) trying to engage with social media when on holiday, and then, you know, b) "Can you watch the things? Because I'm going to go for a swim." Somebody had to stay behind to guard the devices. . .
If you're sitting in Hawaii reading this [holds up newspaper], you're defining yourself. If there's a backlit screen on this, I don't know what the hell you're reading. Rolex can't advertise on the back. You're hooked up with a device manufacturer but it says nothing about the content that you're consuming.
On print media and money
It's one of the greatest failings of media right now that people forget the fact that there is huge value in what this [newspaper] says about you. People are concerned with their sunglasses, what luggage you're going to have, what shoes you're wearing, and this is just as important. And that is something which digital media has not offered. You could bring in the 10 CEOs of the world's biggest companies, and you could show them the most elaborate, Pixar-commissioned, incredible web page with all kinds of capabilities for elaborate devices, and then, if somebody said the outside cover is available for this [newspaper], suddenly, everybody would be scrambling for that instead.
We see it happen time and again. Rush to social media? Show me the money. It's like Corvette-car syndrome. It's the 56-year-old guy who sees his 13-year-old niece on Facebook, goes and talks to his boardroom and says we have to get on that, with absolutely no strategy and not realizing that it's a free medium. There's no barrier of entry. It doesn't hurt you to sign up. And as the brands get into it, it doesn't hurt them either. I think that's why we have this massive quandary right now in the media landscape. People feel that they have to court every single new shiny object that comes to market, when there should be a belief and a conviction to just stick to your guns.
Visit Design Edge Canada for more from Brûlé's OCAD presentation.
Here are some excerpts from his talk.
![]() |
Tyler Brûlé shows off a Monocle spread at OCAD university
|
On subscriptions and paywalls
Bankers always drive the quality—let's sell as many subscriptions as we can so that you can have Time magazine, or Newsweek, you'll get 52 issues a year, plus you'll have the talk radio, and you'll have the tacky awful nylon bag, and you can have it for $11.99. Nobody's considering the logistics. All of this seemed absolutely absurd to us [at Monocle]. How can you drive and build the business? Is there any real value? Yes, there's lots of people looking at your magazine, but are they real, engaged consumers if they're getting 52 copies a year for $11.99? That's a massive sinkhole.
We went the other way, we said we're going to have a paywall at the very beginning. And we're going to have correspondents around the world, and we're going to charge a confident price because this whole idea of selling subscriptions at such a low price is over. So we said, $150 no matter where you're from in the world. Even if you live next to the printing plant, you pay $150. Now, obviously, we make a lot of money off the people who live next to the printing plant, and we make absolutely no money off our readers in Mozambique—thankfully there's only three of them. . .
Advertisers like the fact that people are spending serious money. It obviously enables a journalistic investment on our side, but also it means the readers are completely engaged because they pay up for the brand. There's passion and commitment from our readership base.
On digital editions
I'm very convinced that the only people that are making money on a monthly basis on iPad editions are in the porn business. Because for a magazine of our size and volume you'd probably have to staff-up at least five, maybe seven people. You do the math on that, you're in half a million dollars a year. We have just not seen the surge in demand for that. For market research, I was watching people on vacation with their Kobos etc., and it was just sort of watching people a) trying to engage with social media when on holiday, and then, you know, b) "Can you watch the things? Because I'm going to go for a swim." Somebody had to stay behind to guard the devices. . .
If you're sitting in Hawaii reading this [holds up newspaper], you're defining yourself. If there's a backlit screen on this, I don't know what the hell you're reading. Rolex can't advertise on the back. You're hooked up with a device manufacturer but it says nothing about the content that you're consuming.
On print media and money
It's one of the greatest failings of media right now that people forget the fact that there is huge value in what this [newspaper] says about you. People are concerned with their sunglasses, what luggage you're going to have, what shoes you're wearing, and this is just as important. And that is something which digital media has not offered. You could bring in the 10 CEOs of the world's biggest companies, and you could show them the most elaborate, Pixar-commissioned, incredible web page with all kinds of capabilities for elaborate devices, and then, if somebody said the outside cover is available for this [newspaper], suddenly, everybody would be scrambling for that instead.
We see it happen time and again. Rush to social media? Show me the money. It's like Corvette-car syndrome. It's the 56-year-old guy who sees his 13-year-old niece on Facebook, goes and talks to his boardroom and says we have to get on that, with absolutely no strategy and not realizing that it's a free medium. There's no barrier of entry. It doesn't hurt you to sign up. And as the brands get into it, it doesn't hurt them either. I think that's why we have this massive quandary right now in the media landscape. People feel that they have to court every single new shiny object that comes to market, when there should be a belief and a conviction to just stick to your guns.
Visit Design Edge Canada for more from Brûlé's OCAD presentation.
Most Recent News Comment
![]() |
|
Jaded says: | |
Wow, Torstar really seems to be on a mission to bankrupt one magazine after another.... |
Most Recent Blog Comment
![]() |
|
Lorene Shyba says: | |
Full of terrific information, Thanks!... |
Most Read Stories
Special Reports
Masthead Web Edition Archives
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
And one more thanks for taking the high road to in you discussion!!!
Personally I always go direct with no repercussions, but I keep their agency in the loop so we keep everybody happy and no end runs around the agency, you have to build trust with all stakeholders in the buying process. I always get referred to the agency anyway and this is a good intro to get noticed when you mention the client's name.
Magazines are fundamentally sound and effective as part of a media buy. Review the metrics of bundling magazine with digital versus digital in isolation-pretty compelling.
Scott Stevenson
Publisher - Chill & Golf Canada Magazines
By the way I love magazines! I love how they feel, I love the photography, I love the personalities of the writers, how the ads look. I just love everything about magazines. naturally we have embraced all facets of media but magazines remain my fav! And I keep them.
I'm chuckling because you are quite correct about
the absence of proper spacing and paragraphs.
If it will set your mind at ease, yes I did at last find the Return key.
Clearly it has taken me until now to learn to use it- Ha Ha!
Thanks for your kind words about my points.
And I genuinely appreciate the comments about the absence of breaks in the post. That edification will may future entries more tidy.
Lastly- Thank you for addressing me as Mr. Kelly.
Even electronically I still appreciate that courtesy.
Mr Kelly: do you know where the Return button is on your keyboard? I don't mean to insult you, but man... do you write proposals that way? You finally got to your points, and excellent they were, the last 20 lines or so.
Masthead: Is there some kind of award for longest comment post in your history? Please confer to Mr. Kelly
“According to new research from Nielsen, in-store discovery (72%) tends to be the largest driver of new product awareness. TV (59%) and print (54%) advertising are leading influencers as well. Of the 21 methods reviewed in the study, however, the advice of family and friends (77%) is the most persuasive when looking for information about new products. Other top methods around the world include receiving a free sample (70%), searching the Internet (67%), and professional/expert word-of-mouth advice (66%).”
Source: http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/consumer/a-multi-mix-media-approach-drives-new-product-awareness/
I'm reaching the people that count and not just counting the people I reach. As planners/buyers, we can make a case for and against the inclusion of any media for any campaign. Fair enough. But I would encourage you in your planning to explore each of the options to see how well they can complement your creative media campaign. Each plan should be a work of art. Your art.
Magazines offer a targeted audience like no other media with less wastage including radio and outdoor. If you want to reach lawyers you will go into a lawyer magazine, teachers in a teacher magazine etc.You cannot do this with a key word search campaign.
For a short campaign I have banner ads and email newsletters to increase the campaign frequency along with a magazine that provides you with great reach into that audience.
A magazine ad provides in-depth information about your product or service that is not as disruptive as a TV ad while you are watching a show, but actually complements the editorial environment. Magazines are the most trusted medium for information and an article carries a lot of weight with the reader as it is credible.
We are offer you an integrated approach that will help your business grow with this market.
This is the sales pitch I will use.
I am sorry I hit a nerve and you saying you will not work with the agency suggests that you are unprofessional as you can't handle rejection very well.
Hope this helps.
I can get more bang for my buck on radio for example. Let me hear your sales pitch.